Length: 1250 words, minimum
In all cases, I expect your writing to display a thorough understanding of the texts you use, most importantly Wright?s A Short History of Progress. I have included a question in the prompt. Your thesis will likely be your answer to this question.
In all cases I will expect you to utilize the language of your source material. Use Wright?s terminology. Show the reader that you understand it. Make connections that are surprising and have intellectual depth. Push yourself.
Your audience is, and should always be, intelligent, interested readers who are not necessarily in this class and may or may not have read the texts you cite. The best academic writing gives just enough information about the sources to allow the reader to follow the argument. MLA will count on this assignment so spend some time ensuring that your paper?s format, citing method, Works Cited page, and so on are all perfect.
Wright is a bummer. Brighten things up by writing a response to Wright?s book wherein you offer some glimmer of hope. Is there a way out of this that still maintains our current lifestyle and population? I?d prefer an ideological response to a science fiction one. Try to match
Wright?s tone/style if you can. (Or embrace your own if you?d prefer not to do a fake-Wright.)
Note that Wright doesn?t use in-text citations, but everything?s still cited (there?s a long index of
sources at the back of his book). I will expect MLA format with proper citations, including
Develop your own paper topic using your own vast intelligence, resources, discussion boards,
responses, and ideas.
A short history of life is a book by Ronald Wright. In his book, Wright tries to make us understand the origin of civilization of mankind. According to him, twentieth century was a period of much pressure on natural systems. Introductory part of this book mainly focuses on Gauguin?s questions about life. There are three main questions of concern according to Gauguin. The first question tries to address our origin and the second question concerns what we really are as human beings, and finally where we are headed. Wright tries to emphasize on Gauguin?s third question in his book. He states that the third question can only be fully answered after addressing the first two questions. According to Wright, human behavior can only be understood through answering Gauguin’s questions (Wright 5).
Where do we come from and what are we?
These two questions have always brought so much controversy. There are those who believe that man was created by God while others argue that, man evolved into the being we see today. I strongly believe that man evolved from a simple creature to a complex being. There is so much similarity between human beings and other animals a fact that proves indeed evolution is the main origin of mankind. I don?t believe that man was created by a supernatural being due to lack of enough evidence to this. But, there is a difference. The difference that exists between mankind and animals is the intelligence level and progress. Mankind has made so much progress in life compared to animals; in addition to that, he is more intelligent than animals (Wright 7).
Where are we going to?
Generally there is so much that it becomes impossible to explain where exactly we are headed to. Technological advancement makes it even harder to predict where men will be in the coming few years. Due to technology, man has been able to invent better materials and machines that have impacted his life both positively and negatively. Fire arms have been used by man for protection and destruction. Diseases like cancer and HIV and AIDS have been of great concern to mankind. He still wonders whether or not there will be a cure for these diseases (Wright 12).
Wright, Ronald. A Short History of Progress. New York: Carroll & Graf,, 2005. 1-27. Print.
A short history in progress is a series of lectures given by Wright about the continuous evolution nature of human kind which has led to revolutionary of various sectors of the economy impacting much pressure to the natural systems. In chapter two of his work, ?The experiment? he believes that human beings have become experimental creatures by their own making and they have been unable to control it since 1900s.
I agree with his progressive or experimental argument that human beings have continued to evolve each day through advancement of the current and invention of new technologies to solve the current problems. But, this has created several problems which also prompt them to think of other technologies. For instance, over the last ten decades, there has been multiplication of the population and economy by a factor of one and six respectively (Wright 47). This has prompted everyone to think of one big civilization. Thus, feeding of the whole planet leads to deforestation to create new lands for agriculture, urbanization to settle the increasing population and industrialization to increase productivity and development of new and advanced tools and machines to reduce labor.
According to Wright, this drive to look for solutions of the current problems is an experiment. Because, history triggers human being to think on how they can improve their welfare, leading to innovations and inventions of new technologies. I think it is worthy to note that human beings have been progressively evolving and I agree with Wrights argument of experimental thought that the experiment has never been tried before due to the ignorance of researchers and other high profiled academicians and must be brought into control to prevent current and future potential changes.
On the other hand, I disagree with his argument that if this is not controlled, the nature will shrug letting apes run the laboratory for fun. This is because, there has been great technological advancements especially in growth of molecular biology and biotechnology which will control food insecurity feeding the growing population, improvement of health care, change of traditional mode of communication to information technology just to mention a few (Wright 49).
Wright, Ronald. A Short History of Progress. New York: Carroll & Graf, 2005. 29-53. Print.
In the third chapter of Ronald Wright?s work A Short History of Progress, he describes how civilizations flourished and then eventually collapsed due to those civilizations? own doing. He used the ancient civilizations of Sumer and Easter Island to show how humans occupied their territories, used available natural resources to pursue civilization and advancements, and depleted these natural resources which then eventually led to these civilizations? downfall. Wright recounts an example, that Easter Island villagers damaged their natural environments to build boats and structures. Sumerians destroyed their environment through their large irrigation system causing deforestation. He also used Eden as an illustration, that Adam and Eve left the garden damaged and set it for the disaster of Noah?s flood. Wright says that not only does advancing technology and culture destroys the civilization itself, but also that a few powerful rulers tend to dominate many in the urbanized societies.
At first glance, Wright sounds anti-civilization because of the words that he uses describing how man destroyed their own environments as progress is being achieved. However at a more careful study of how Chapter 3 relates to the entire book, I believe that he encourages his readers to think critically. Are we going to base all destruction to higher forces such as God, or are these events a product of our own irresponsibility? For me, when he used Eden as an example, it hit a realization that biblical heritage would say that humans were placed in the garden to take care of it, but we have done otherwise. Wright might not be attributing all world disaster as error to humans, but he is giving a strong urge to reconsider and look back to what has already happened. I think he was not nostalgic but simply making a strong point and I believe that this is the time we should recognize the seriousness.
Wright, Ronald. A Short History of Progress. Massachusetts: Da Capo Press, 2004. Print
Paper 1 Idea
A short history in progress is a series of lectures given by Wright about the continuous evolution nature of human kind which has led to revolutionary of various sectors of the economy impacting much pressure to the natural systems. Wright believes that progress of development of civilization has led to creation of progressive problems which can only be solved by further progress which call for technological advancement and shift from traditional ways of thinking and methods of wealth creation. Personally, this is the most serious problem now but I think human being has a ability to improve the condition in the future. Wright also argues that civilization is undoubtedly an agglomeration of problems, which can only be addressed by technological advancements of equal magnitude. I agree with his opinion that technological advancements brought harmful consequences. But, if he believe that the existence of civilization is wrong, I cannot agree with that part. I would concentrate my writing on this part.
Wright, Ronald. A Short History of Progress. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo, 2004.
These Chapter1, 2, 3, paper 1 idea are my works on my discussion board.
Please read these assignment and reflect these views in the essay adequately and clearly.
Place an order of a custom essay for this assignment with us now. You are guaranteed; a custom premium paper being delivered within its deadline, personalized customer support and communication with your writer through out the order preparation period.